Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1265505
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() |
| Date | 2015-11-09 11:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qsRyG-50w-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qr31h-7c0-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qr3DX-7Fs-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qr3Xl-7Mx-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrlKy-2wU-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsRyG-50w-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:29:17AM +0530, sanjeev sharma wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 10:39:13AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 03:26:48PM +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote: > > > _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() treat DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL similar to > > > DMA_TO_DEVICE which means that destination buffer is device > > > memory,means cpu may have written some data to source buffer and > > > data may be in cache line.For cleaner operation we need to call > > > outer_flush_range() which will clean and invalidate outer cache lines. > > > > Why isn't the clean sufficient in this case? We're mapping the buffer > > to the device, so we clean the dirty lines in the CPU caches and make > > them visible to the device. If the CPU later wants to read the buffer > > (i.e. after the device has DMA'd into it), you'll need to map the > > buffer to the CPU, which will perform the invalidation of the CPU caches. > > Indeed. bidirectional mode is already handled prefectly well by this > code. No patches are required. > > Thanks Russell & Will for providing input. > > Let's assume , CPU don't read the buffer then there could be the problem > correct ? IMO, to handle every use case outer_flush_range can be used ? > If still it doesn't make sense to use flush on bidirectional mappings, then > FIXME comment should be removed from the function to avoid any > Confusion. > > > > Please let me know what you think on above comment ? I still don't understand the problem that you're trying to fix. Sorry, Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() Sanjeev Sharma <sanjeev_sharma@mentor.com> - 2015-11-04 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-04 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-04 12:00 +0100
RE: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() "Sharma, Sanjeev" <Sanjeev_Sharma@mentor.com> - 2015-11-05 07:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-09 11:10 +0100
RE: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() "Sharma, Sanjeev" <Sanjeev_Sharma@mentor.com> - 2015-11-09 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> - 2015-11-09 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ARM:dma-mapping: Handle DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL in _dma_page_cpu_to_dev() Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-09 13:10 +0100
csiph-web