Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1264738
| From | "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup |
| Date | 2015-11-07 07:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qs4HF-6ER-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qs4HF-6ER-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Please ignore this one, forgot to cc to linux-arm-kernel list.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yang
On 11/6/2015 9:34 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> ARM64 JIT used FP (x29) as eBPF fp register, but FP is subjected to
> change during function call so it may cause the BPF prog stack base address
> change too. Whenever, it pointed to the bottom of BPF prog stack instead of
> the top.
>
> So, when copying data via bpf_probe_read, it will be copied to (SP - offset),
> then it may overwrite the saved FP/LR.
>
> Use x25 to replace FP as BPF stack base register (fp). Since x25 is callee
> saved register, so it will keep intact during function call.
> It is initialized in BPF prog prologue when BPF prog is started to run
> everytime. When BPF prog exits, it could be just tossed.
>
> Other than this the BPf prog stack base need to be setup before function
> call stack.
>
> So, the BPF stack layout looks like:
>
> high
> original A64_SP => 0:+-----+ BPF prologue
> | | FP/LR and callee saved registers
> BPF fp register => +64:+-----+
> | |
> | ... | BPF prog stack
> | |
> | |
> current A64_SP => +-----+
> | |
> | ... | Function call stack
> | |
> +-----+
> low
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
> CC: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
> CC: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index a44e529..6809647 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static const int bpf2a64[] = {
> [BPF_REG_8] = A64_R(21),
> [BPF_REG_9] = A64_R(22),
> /* read-only frame pointer to access stack */
> - [BPF_REG_FP] = A64_FP,
> + [BPF_REG_FP] = A64_R(25),
> /* temporary register for internal BPF JIT */
> [TMP_REG_1] = A64_R(23),
> [TMP_REG_2] = A64_R(24),
> @@ -155,18 +155,42 @@ static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
> stack_size += 4; /* extra for skb_copy_bits buffer */
> stack_size = STACK_ALIGN(stack_size);
>
> + /*
> + * BPF prog stack layout
> + *
> + * high
> + * original A64_SP => 0:+-----+ BPF prologue
> + * | | FP/LR and callee saved registers
> + * BPF fp register => +64:+-----+
> + * | |
> + * | ... | BPF prog stack
> + * | |
> + * | |
> + * current A64_SP => +-----+
> + * | |
> + * | ... | Function call stack
> + * | |
> + * +-----+
> + * low
> + *
> + */
> +
> + /* Save FP and LR registers to stay align with ARM64 AAPCS */
> + emit(A64_PUSH(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
> +
> /* Save callee-saved register */
> emit(A64_PUSH(r6, r7, A64_SP), ctx);
> emit(A64_PUSH(r8, r9, A64_SP), ctx);
> if (ctx->tmp_used)
> emit(A64_PUSH(tmp1, tmp2, A64_SP), ctx);
>
> - /* Set up BPF stack */
> - emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, stack_size), ctx);
> -
> - /* Set up frame pointer */
> + /* Set up BPF prog stack base register (x25) */
> emit(A64_MOV(1, fp, A64_SP), ctx);
>
> + /* Set up function call stack */
> + emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, stack_size), ctx);
> + emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_FP, A64_SP), ctx);
> +
> /* Clear registers A and X */
> emit_a64_mov_i64(ra, 0, ctx);
> emit_a64_mov_i64(rx, 0, ctx);
> @@ -196,8 +220,8 @@ static void build_epilogue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
> emit(A64_POP(r8, r9, A64_SP), ctx);
> emit(A64_POP(r6, r7, A64_SP), ctx);
>
> - /* Restore frame pointer */
> - emit(A64_MOV(1, fp, A64_SP), ctx);
> + /* Restore FP/LR registers */
> + emit(A64_POP(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
>
> /* Set return value */
> emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(0), r0), ctx);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix JIT stack setup "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-07 07:00 +0100
csiph-web