Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1264677
| From | "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness |
| Date | 2015-11-07 02:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qs01j-3vl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qrCBI-5dP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrKfU-1Vl-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrRKr-6IF-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrT9x-7vW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrYsx-2Hd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/06/15 15:17, Dan Williams wrote: >> >> Is it really required to do that on all cpus? > > I believe it is, but I'll double check. > It's required on all CPUs on which the DAX memory may have been dirtied. This is similar to the way we flush TLBs. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-11-06 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-06 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-11-06 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-06 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-11-07 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2015-11-07 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-07 08:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-11-07 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-07 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-11-07 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-07 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] "big hammer" for DAX msync/fsync correctness "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2015-11-06 21:30 +0100
csiph-web