Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1263502

[PATCH v2 1/3] signal: change sig_task_ignored(force) to take sig_kernel_only() into account

From Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH v2 1/3] signal: change sig_task_ignored(force) to take sig_kernel_only() into account
Date 2015-11-05 20:30 +0100
Message-ID <qryoq-2og-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qryoq-2og-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


sig_task_ignored(force => true) returns false unless sig_kernel_ignore().
This makes no sense if !sig_kernel_only(), the signal will be dropped in
get_signal() anyway.

This patch simplifies the next change and allows us to do more cleanups,
in particular we can unify the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE/sig_kernel_only() check
in sig_task_ignored() and get_signal().

The user-visible change is that, since we drop the SIG_DFL signal early,
it won't be reported to debugger. I think this is fine, but probably we
will change this later, we need to fix this logic anyway. Currently we
rely on the fact that (say) send_sigtrap() uses force_sig_info() which
clears SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE, and this is really bad.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/signal.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index d64efad..87209e5 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
 	handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
 
 	if (unlikely(t->signal->flags & SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE) &&
-			handler == SIG_DFL && !force)
+	    handler == SIG_DFL && !(force && sig_kernel_only(sig)))
 		return 1;
 
 	return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig);
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/3] signal: kill the obsolete SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE check in  complete_signal() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-11-05 20:30 +0100
  [PATCH v2 1/3] signal: change sig_task_ignored(force) to take  sig_kernel_only() into account Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-11-05 20:30 +0100
  [PATCH v2 2/3] signal: kill the obsolete SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE check  in complete_signal() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-11-05 20:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] signal: kill the obsolete SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE check  in complete_signal() Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-11-06 00:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] signal: kill the obsolete SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE check  in complete_signal() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-11-06 14:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 0/3] signal: kill the obsolete SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE check  in complete_signal() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-11-06 19:30 +0100

csiph-web