Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1263512
| From | Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 00/11] DAX fsynx/msync support |
| Date | 2015-11-05 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qryHL-2vb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qqao9-6f8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qqohr-6oB-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qqtK9-1nc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qquwy-1Uo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrofo-4bJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> writes: >> But this part is not. It is up to the I/O scheduler to decide when to >> dispatch requests. It can hold on to them for a variety of reasons. >> Flush requests, however, do not go through the I/O scheduler. At the > > That's pure REQ_FLUSH bios, right? Aren't data IOs with > REQ_FLUSH|REQ_FUA sorted like any other IO? No, they also go through the flush machinery, and so short-circuit the I/O scheduler. >> Des xfs rely on this model for correctness? If so, I'd say we've got a >> problem > > No, it doesn't. The XFS integrity model doesn't trust the IO layers > to tell the truth about IO ordering and completion or for it's > developers to fully understand how IO layer ordering works. :P > > i.e. we wait for full completions of all dependent IO before issuing > flushes or log writes that use REQ_FLUSH|REQ_FUA semantics to ensure > the dependent IOs are fully caught by the cache flushes... OK, phew! ;-) -Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC 00/11] DAX fsynx/msync support Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-11-02 00:40 +0100
Re: [RFC 00/11] DAX fsynx/msync support Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-11-02 15:30 +0100
Re: [RFC 00/11] DAX fsynx/msync support Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-11-02 21:20 +0100
Re: [RFC 00/11] DAX fsynx/msync support Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-11-02 22:10 +0100
Re: [RFC 00/11] DAX fsynx/msync support Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-11-04 19:40 +0100
Re: [RFC 00/11] DAX fsynx/msync support Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2015-11-05 09:40 +0100
Re: [RFC 00/11] DAX fsynx/msync support Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-11-05 20:50 +0100
Re: [RFC 00/11] DAX fsynx/msync support Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-11-05 22:00 +0100
csiph-web