Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1263428
| From | Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics |
| Date | 2015-11-05 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qrw3i-Mt-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qprhn-3F0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qprhn-3F0-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qqqsW-7Ek-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrvAg-C9-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrvTA-IK-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/05/2015 11:43 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 11:29:29AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: >> On 11/02/2015 11:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 07:26:35PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >>>> This patch enables the accumulation of kicking and waiting related >>>> PV qspinlock statistics when the new QUEUED_LOCK_STAT configuration >>>> option is selected. It also enables the collection of data which >>>> enable us to calculate the kicking and wakeup latencies which have >>>> a heavy dependency on the CPUs being used. >>>> >>>> The statistical counters are per-cpu variables to minimize the >>>> performance overhead in their updates. These counters are exported >>>> via the sysfs filesystem under the /sys/kernel/qlockstat directory. >>>> When the corresponding sysfs files are read, summation and computing >>>> of the required data are then performed. >>> Why did you switch to sysfs? You can create custom debugfs files too. >> I was not aware of that capability. So you mean using debugfs_create_file() >> using custom file_operations. Right? > Yep. > >> That doesn't seem to be easier than >> using sysfs. However, I can use that if you think it is better to use >> debugfs. > Mostly I just wanted to point out that it was possible; you need not > change to sysfs because debugfs lacks the capability. > > But now that you ask, I think debugfs might be the better place, such > statistics (and the proposed CONFIG symbol) are purely for debug > purposes, right? Davidlohr had asked me to use per-cpu counters to reduce performance overhead so that they can be usable in production system. That is another reason why I move to sysfs. BTW, do you have comments on the other patches in the series? I would like to collect all the comments before I renew the series. Cheers, Longman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-02 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-11-05 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-05 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-11-05 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-05 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-11-05 18:40 +0100
csiph-web