Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1264534
| From | Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: Add naive RSS support |
| Date | 2015-11-06 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qrWh4-13l-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qrU5z-875-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrU5A-875-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrUIj-9d-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Marcin,
[...]
>> +static int mvneta_config_rss(struct mvneta_port *pp)
>> +{
>> + int cpu;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + netif_tx_stop_all_queues(pp->dev);
>> +
>> + /* Mask all ethernet port interrupts */
>> + mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_INTR_NEW_MASK, 0);
>
> Shouldn't the interrupts be masked on each online cpu? There is percpu
> unmask function (mvneta_percpu_unmask_interrupt), so maybe ther should
> be also mvneta_percpu_mask_interrupt. With this masking should look
> like below:
>
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> smp_call_function_single(cpu, mvneta_percpu_unmask_interrupt,
> pp, true);
Indeed you are right, however I am a bit surprised to not had had issue
cause by this. I will fix it.
>
>> + mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_INTR_OLD_MASK, 0);
>> + mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_INTR_MISC_MASK, 0);
>> +
>> + /* We have to synchronise on the napi of each CPU */
>> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> + struct mvneta_pcpu_port *pcpu_port =
>> + per_cpu_ptr(pp->ports, cpu);
>> +
>> + napi_synchronize(&pcpu_port->napi);
>> + napi_disable(&pcpu_port->napi);
>> + }
>> +
>> + pp->rxq_def = pp->indir[0];
>> +
>> + /* update unicast mapping */
>> + mvneta_set_rx_mode(pp->dev);
>> +
>> + /* Update val of portCfg register accordingly with all RxQueue types */
>> + val = MVNETA_PORT_CONFIG_DEFL_VALUE(pp->rxq_def);
>> + mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_PORT_CONFIG, val);
>> +
>> + /* Update the elected CPU matching the new rxq_def */
>> + mvneta_percpu_elect(pp);
>> +
>> + /* We have to synchronise on the napi of each CPU */
>> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> + struct mvneta_pcpu_port *pcpu_port =
>> + per_cpu_ptr(pp->ports, cpu);
>> +
>> + napi_enable(&pcpu_port->napi);
>> + }
>> +
>
> rxq_def changed, but txq vs CPU mapping remained as in the beginning -
> is it intentional?
txq vs CPU mapping is change in the mvneta_percpu_elect() function.
Thanks for this prompt review
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/2] net: mvneta: Introduce RSS support Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-06 19:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: Add naive RSS support Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-06 19:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: Add naive RSS support Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - 2015-11-06 20:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] net: mvneta: Add naive RSS support Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-06 22:00 +0100
[RFC PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: Associate RX queues with each CPU Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-06 19:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: mvneta: Introduce RSS support Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - 2015-11-06 20:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: mvneta: Introduce RSS support Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-09 19:20 +0100
csiph-web