Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1264176
| From | "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option |
| Date | 2015-11-06 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qrSZR-7sM-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qravM-3Aq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrOtb-4v4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrOMx-4BZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrS3N-6Pn-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrS3N-6Pn-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/6/2015 8:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:21:09PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:50:02PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:30:09PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 09:37:51AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>>>>> FRAME_POINTER is defined in lib/Kconfig.debug, it is unnecessary to redefine
>>>>> it in arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug.
>>>>
>>>> It might be worth noting that this adds a dependency on DEBUG_KERNEL
>>>> for building with frame pointers. I'm ok with that (it appears to be
>>>> enabled in defconfig and follows the vast majority of other archs) but
>>>> it is a change in behaviour.
>>>>
>>>> With that:
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>>
>>> The code in arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c assumes we have frame
>>> pointers regardless of FRAME_POINTER. Depending on what the compiler
>>> decides to use x29 for, we could get some weird fake unwinding and/or
>>> dodgy memory accesses.
>>>
>>> I think we should first audit the uses of frame pointers to ensure that
>>> they are guarded for !FRAME_POINTER.
>>
>> Or we just select FRAME_POINTER in the ARM64 Kconfig entry.
>
> Yang, did you see any benefit disabling frame pointers, or was this patch
> purely based on you spotting a duplicate Kconfig entry?
It just spots a duplicate Kconfig entry.
FRAME_POINTER is defined in both lib/Kconfig.debug and
arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug.
The lib/Kconfig.debug one looks like:
config FRAME_POINTER
bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && \
(CRIS || M68K || FRV || UML || \
AVR32 || SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || METAG) || \
ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
default y if (DEBUG_INFO && UML) || ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
help
If you say Y here the resulting kernel image will be slightly
larger and slower, but it gives very useful debugging information
in case of kernel bugs. (precise oopses/stacktraces/warnings)
The common one just depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS.
ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS is selected by ARM64 kconfig entry.
To answer Catalin's question about:
> However, the patch would allow one to
> disable FRAME_POINTERS (not sure it has any effect on the aarch64 gcc
> though).
No, it doesn't. Actually, FRAME_POINTER could be disabled regardless of
the patch.
Thanks,
Yang
>
> Will
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-04 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-06 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2015-11-06 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-06 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-06 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-11-06 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-11-06 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-11-09 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-11-06 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-11-06 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-06 17:20 +0100
csiph-web