Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1260824
| From | Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 0/8] Add support for NVIDIA Tegra XUSB |
| Date | 2015-11-02 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qqr5G-871-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qqlWh-4QZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Martyn, On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> wrote: > This series is based on commits that can be found in the git tree here: > > https://github.com/thierryreding/linux/commits/staging/xhci > > I have included the patches I've used from that tree as patches 1-5. > > The above patches were submitted for review back in May: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/4/574 > > The approach taken in these patches was deemed not appropriate (treating > the XUSB as a MFD). > > In patch 6 I add the bindings based in those submitted for review here > (with a few modifications currently required by the driver): > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg130940.html > > I have included my changes to the original patch series in patch 7. With > these modifications the patch series builds and works, but is rather hacky. > Devices for the mailbox driver and xHCI driver are now created in the xusb > driver (still under the mfd directory for now - it will be moved before > this series is submitted properly). As the child devices use > infrastructure which expects the device to be associated with a of_node, > it has been necessary to point the child device at the parents of_node > where this is needed. This approach did not seem viable for the mailbox > API, so to get that working the child device node was pointed to the > parents of_node (in tegra_xusb_add_device). The unfortunate side effect of > this is that upon device creation the parents probe routine gets called... > > Not good. > > Patch 8 attempts to resolve this. When passing the parents device node to > the mailbox API, the mailbox's receive callback was raising errors as > that function is looking for the drvdata stored in the child's device node, > but getting the parents. This patch jumps though a few hoops to get to the > child's device node. After my last submission, we had a discussion about the mailbox and decided not to use the mailbox framework and instead use a private API between the xHCI driver and the XUSB_PADCTL driver. > Unfortunately, whilst the receive callback seems to be getting the right > drvdata, USB3 devices are being enumerated as USB2 devices rather than > USB3 devices, so something is clearly not right. Tegra124? Tegra210? Which board? Thanks, Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 0/8] Add support for NVIDIA Tegra XUSB Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-11-02 13:00 +0100
Re: [RFC 0/8] Add support for NVIDIA Tegra XUSB Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> - 2015-11-02 18:30 +0100
Re: [RFC 0/8] Add support for NVIDIA Tegra XUSB Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org> - 2015-11-02 18:30 +0100
Re: [RFC 0/8] Add support for NVIDIA Tegra XUSB Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.co.uk> - 2015-11-02 18:40 +0100
csiph-web