Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1262023
| From | YH Huang <yh.huang@mediatek.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] pwm-backlight: fix the panel power sequence |
| Date | 2015-11-04 02:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qqVn3-2e0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <qoXCG-23G-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qpcBH-30K-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qpfge-4FN-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qqEYX-9k-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <qqHDr-1VD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 12:08 +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi YH,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 03.11.2015, 16:11 +0800 schrieb YH Huang:
> > > The reasoning is that devices where there is no phandle link pointing to
> > > the backlight (for example from a simple-panel node), we should keep the
> > > current default behaviour (enable during probe).
> >
> > I have a little problem for the current default behaviour.
> > Should we enable during probe?
>
> Here I mean enabling the backlight (at the end of the probe function),
> not enabling the GPIO already when requesting it.
>
> > Before this patch ( http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324690/ ),
> > we disable "enable-gpio" in the probe function.
>
> While before this patch the GPIO would be initialized in the disabled
> state, the call to backlight_update_status at the end of the probe
> function would still enable the backlight afterwards.
Based on this, could we disable it initially and update in the
backlight_update_status function?
Like this,
if (pb->enable_gpio) {
if (phandle &&
gpiod_get_direction(pb->enable_gpio) == GPIOF_DIR_OUT &&
gpiod_get_value(pb->enable_gpio) == 1)
gpiod_direction_output(pb->enable_gpio, 1);
else
gpiod_direction_output(pb->enable_gpio, 0);
}
And then update with props.brightness in backlight_update_status.
I am not sure, maybe I miss something.
Regards,
YH Huang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2] pwm-backlight: fix the panel power sequence YH Huang <yh.huang@mediatek.com> - 2015-11-03 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] pwm-backlight: fix the panel power sequence Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2015-11-03 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] pwm-backlight: fix the panel power sequence YH Huang <yh.huang@mediatek.com> - 2015-11-04 02:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] pwm-backlight: fix the panel power sequence Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2015-11-05 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] pwm-backlight: fix the panel power sequence YH Huang <yh.huang@mediatek.com> - 2015-11-06 09:40 +0100
csiph-web