Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1259791
| From | Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: assert SMI lock |
| Date | 2015-10-30 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qppfz-2sf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qpoMx-22G-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qpoMx-22G-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qpoWe-25R-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qpp5U-2oR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Oct. Friday 30 (44) 10:01 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > static int _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg)
> > > > {
> > > > - struct mii_bus *bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev);
> > > > + struct mii_bus *bus;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > + assert_smi_lock(ds);
> > > > +
> > > > + bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev);
> > >
> > > Is this change of when bus is assigned actually required?
> >
> > No, but I found not necessary to issue this "mdio_bus" lookup if the
> > lock is not held (see net/dsa/dsa.c:555). Do you prefer not to do that?
>
> You are optimising for an error condition. If this optimisation saves
> anything, it means we have a locking bug!
Very good point, I'll get rid of that then.
> As a separate patch, i would do this lookup once in a setup function
> and save it away in ps. We just need to watch out for the probe
> register accesses.
Yes, I already put that on a todo list ;-)
> > Also are you OK with removing all the "Must be called with..." comments,
>
> Yes, it will become a lot more clear when the kernel outputs a stack dump!
Good, sending a v2 right away then.
Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: assert SMI lock Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-10-30 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: assert SMI lock Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2015-10-30 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: assert SMI lock Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-10-30 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: assert SMI lock Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2015-10-30 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: assert SMI lock Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2015-10-30 22:20 +0100
csiph-web