Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1257748
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories |
| Date | Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:50:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qotEC-89q-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qjTgm-2Z7-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjWnT-7zG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qk6dA-5ph-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
| User-Agent | KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.1.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 28 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:16:45 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <4167825.7F75u7l572@vostro.rjw.lan> |
| X-Original-References | <cover.1444924623.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <561FFDA7.3080903@codeaurora.org> <20151016055118.GR19018@linux> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1257748 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Friday, October 16, 2015 11:21:18 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15-10-15, 12:25, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > Btw, does a Review-by have an implicit Acked-by? > > I have attended a session at Linaro Connect where this was discussed > and the answer was: > > Acked-by: is more of a general agreement from the person that he is > fine with the patch, but he might not have done a very careful review > and he isn't really responsible for the patch's content. > > Reviewed-by: is a more strict tag and implies that the reviewer has > reviewed it at his best and he is as much responsible for the content > of the patch as the author. That's a bit too much IMO. It means "I have carried out a detailed review of this patch and haven't found problems in it." How much responsibility that implies is not so clear (evidently, there are differing opinions regarding that). Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-28 08:50 +0100 Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-10-28 09:30 +0100
csiph-web