Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1257641
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() |
| Date | 2015-10-28 04:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qopKG-5Hv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qj2OK-A2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qj2OL-A2-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 01:39:01 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > 'timer_mutex' is required to sync work-handlers of policy->cpus. > update_sampling_rate() is just canceling the works and queuing them > again. This isn't protecting anything at all in update_sampling_rate() > and is not gonna be of any use. > > Even if a work-handler is already running for a CPU, > cancel_delayed_work_sync() will wait for it to finish. > > Drop these unnecessary locks. > > Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> I'm queuing this up for 4.4, although I think that the changelog is not right. While at it, what are the race conditions the lock is protecting against? Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-28 04:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-10-28 05:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-28 06:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-10-28 07:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-28 08:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] cpufreq: ondemand: Drop unnecessary locks from update_sampling_rate() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-10-28 10:00 +0100
csiph-web