Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1255382
| From | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH -mm] signal-turn-dequeue_signal_lock-into-kernel_dequeue_signal-fix |
| Date | 2015-10-25 13:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qnsKC-2Zz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qfzzA-1bp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfzzA-1bp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Andrew,
As Markus reports (thanks!)
signal-turn-dequeue_signal_lock-into-kernel_dequeue_signal.patch
conflicts with the recent change in Linus' tree,
> I just realised that this patch will conflict with a fixup patch for nbd
> that will be included in rc7.
>
> dcc909d90ccd (nbd: Add locking for tasks)
>
> I think there is basically one new instance of dequeue_signal_lock() that
> needs to be replaced with kernel_dequeue_signal().
Unless I missed something, this new dequeue_signal_lock() should simply
die, but lets fix the conflict first.
--- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
@@ -592,10 +592,8 @@ static int nbd_thread_send(void *data)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nbd->tasks_lock, flags);
/* Clear maybe pending signals */
- if (signal_pending(current)) {
- siginfo_t info;
- dequeue_signal_lock(current, ¤t->blocked, &info);
- }
+ if (signal_pending(current))
+ kernel_dequeue_signal(NULL);
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH -mm] signal-turn-dequeue_signal_lock-into-kernel_dequeue_signal-fix Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-25 13:40 +0100
csiph-web