Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1255813
| From | Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvmem: mediatek: Add Mediatek EFUSE driver |
| Date | 2015-10-26 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qnNvI-78a-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qk8S6-12c-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qk8S6-12c-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qnMJj-6CU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qnNcm-71B-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 26/10/15 10:28, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:56:24AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>> + .val_bits = 32,
>>> + .reg_stride = 4,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int mtk_efuse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + struct resource *res;
>>> + struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
>>> + struct nvmem_config *econfig;
>>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>>> + void __iomem *base;
>>> +
>>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> + base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(base))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(base);
>>> +
>>> + econfig = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*econfig), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!econfig)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> Why not use static econfig variable?
>
> Because drivers should not assume there is only one instance of them in
> the system. The qfprom driver does this and it's only a matter of
Good point, Yes, you are right. If MTK has possibility of having more
than one efuse we can leave the code as it is.
> putting a second qcom,qfprom node into the device tree to break the
> driver.
It would indeed.
--srini
>
> Sascha
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvmem: mediatek: Add Mediatek EFUSE driver Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2015-10-26 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvmem: mediatek: Add Mediatek EFUSE driver Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> - 2015-10-26 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvmem: mediatek: Add Mediatek EFUSE driver Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2015-10-26 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvmem: mediatek: Add Mediatek EFUSE driver andrew-ct chen <andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com> - 2015-10-27 06:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvmem: mediatek: Add Mediatek EFUSE driver andrew-ct chen <andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com> - 2015-10-27 10:30 +0100
csiph-web