Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1253991

[PATCH v2 5/5] block: enable dax for raw block devices

From Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH v2 5/5] block: enable dax for raw block devices
Date 2015-10-22 19:20 +0200
Message-ID <qmrGW-BA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qmrGW-BA-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


If an application wants exclusive access to all of the persistent memory
provided by an NVDIMM namespace it can use this raw-block-dax facility
to forgo establishing a filesystem.  This capability is targeted
primarily to hypervisors wanting to provision persistent memory for
guests.

Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 fs/block_dev.c |   60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index c1f691859a56..210d05103657 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1687,13 +1687,71 @@ static const struct address_space_operations def_blk_aops = {
 	.is_dirty_writeback = buffer_check_dirty_writeback,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX
+/*
+ * In the raw block case we do not need to contend with truncation nor
+ * unwritten file extents.  Without those concerns there is no need for
+ * additional locking beyond the mmap_sem context that these routines
+ * are already executing under.
+ *
+ * Note, there is no protection if the block device is dynamically
+ * resized (partition grow/shrink) during a fault. A stable block device
+ * size is already not enforced in the blkdev_direct_IO path.
+ *
+ * For DAX, it is the responsibility of the block device driver to
+ * ensure the whole-disk device size is stable while requests are in
+ * flight.
+ *
+ * Finally, in contrast to the generic_file_mmap() path, there are no
+ * calls to sb_start_pagefault().  That is meant to synchronize write
+ * faults against requests to freeze the contents of the filesystem
+ * hosting vma->vm_file.  However, in the case of a block device special
+ * file, it is a 0-sized device node usually hosted on devtmpfs, i.e.
+ * nothing to do with the super_block for bdev_file_inode(vma->vm_file).
+ * We could call get_super() in this path to retrieve the right
+ * super_block, but the generic_file_mmap() path does not do this for
+ * the CONFIG_FS_DAX=n case.
+ */
+static int blkdev_dax_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	return __dax_fault(vma, vmf, blkdev_get_block, NULL);
+}
+
+static int blkdev_dax_pmd_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+		pmd_t *pmd, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	return __dax_pmd_fault(vma, addr, pmd, flags, blkdev_get_block, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct vm_operations_struct blkdev_dax_vm_ops = {
+	.page_mkwrite	= blkdev_dax_fault,
+	.fault		= blkdev_dax_fault,
+	.pmd_fault	= blkdev_dax_pmd_fault,
+};
+
+static int blkdev_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	struct inode *bd_inode = bdev_file_inode(file);
+
+	if (!IS_DAX(bd_inode))
+		return generic_file_mmap(file, vma);
+
+	file_accessed(file);
+	vma->vm_ops = &blkdev_dax_vm_ops;
+	vma->vm_flags |= VM_MIXEDMAP | VM_HUGEPAGE;
+	return 0;
+}
+#else
+#define blkdev_mmap generic_file_mmap
+#endif
+
 const struct file_operations def_blk_fops = {
 	.open		= blkdev_open,
 	.release	= blkdev_close,
 	.llseek		= block_llseek,
 	.read_iter	= blkdev_read_iter,
 	.write_iter	= blkdev_write_iter,
-	.mmap		= generic_file_mmap,
+	.mmap		= blkdev_mmap,
 	.fsync		= blkdev_fsync,
 	.unlocked_ioctl	= block_ioctl,
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 0/5] block, dax: updates for 4.4 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-10-22 19:20 +0200
  [PATCH v2 5/5] block: enable dax for raw block devices Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-10-22 19:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] block: enable dax for raw block devices Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-10-28 22:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] block: enable dax for raw block devices Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-10-29 08:20 +0100
  [PATCH v2 4/5] block: introduce bdev_file_inode() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-10-22 19:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] block: introduce bdev_file_inode() Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-10-22 22:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] block: introduce bdev_file_inode() Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-10-28 21:20 +0100
  [PATCH v2 3/5] block,  dax: fix lifetime of in-kernel dax mappings with dax_map_atomic() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-10-22 19:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] block, dax: fix lifetime of in-kernel dax mappings with dax_map_atomic() Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-10-28 21:20 +0100
  [PATCH v2 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks()  operations Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-10-22 19:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks() operations Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-10-22 23:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks()  operations "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-10-23 01:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks() operations Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-10-28 22:10 +0100
  [PATCH v2 1/5] pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-10-22 19:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem() Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-10-22 22:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem() Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-10-23 00:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem() Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> - 2015-10-28 22:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem() Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-27 18:40 +0100

csiph-web