Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1253973

Re: [PATCH 3/3] locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and flock_lock_inode_wait

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Benjamin,

[auto build test WARNING on jlayton/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Benjamin-Coddington/locks-introduce-locks_lock_inode_wait/20151022-233848
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> fs/locks.c:1176:5: sparse: symbol 'posix_lock_inode_wait' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> fs/locks.c:1863:5: sparse: symbol 'flock_lock_inode_wait' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 3/3] locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and flock_lock_inode_wait Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> - 2015-10-22 17:40 +0200
  [RFC PATCH] locks: posix_lock_inode_wait() can be static kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-22 18:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 3/3] locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and  flock_lock_inode_wait kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-22 18:40 +0200

csiph-web