Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1253950

Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support

From "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support
Date 2015-10-22 18:20 +0200
Message-ID <qmqKS-7G4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qmgBQ-12w-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qmgBQ-12w-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qmkvM-6IE-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qmqhQ-6SK-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 08:46:33AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 02:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:27:29AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer for a while at the
> >>end of tx processing. The maximum time spent on polling were limited
> >>through a module parameter. To avoid block rx, the loop will end it
> >>there's new other works queued on vhost so in fact socket receive
> >>queue is also be polled.
> >>
> >>busyloop_timeout = 50 gives us following improvement on TCP_RR test:
> >>
> >>size/session/+thu%/+normalize%
> >>     1/     1/   +5%/  -20%
> >>     1/    50/  +17%/   +3%
> >
> >Is there a measureable increase in cpu utilization
> >with busyloop_timeout = 0?
> 
> And since a netperf TCP_RR test is involved, be careful about what netperf
> reports for CPU util if that increase isn't in the context of the guest OS.
> 
> For completeness, looking at the effect on TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS,
> aggregate _RR and even aggregate _RR/packets per second for many VMs on the
> same system would be in order.
> 
> happy benchmarking,
> 
> rick jones

Absolutely, merging a new kernel API just for a specific
benchmark doesn't make sense.
I'm guessing this is just an early RFC, a fuller submission
will probably include more numbers.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH net-next RFC 1/2] vhost: introduce vhost_has_work() Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2015-10-22 07:30 +0200
  [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2015-10-22 07:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-10-22 11:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> - 2015-10-22 17:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-10-22 18:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2015-10-23 09:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2015-10-23 09:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-10-23 15:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 1/2] vhost: introduce vhost_has_work() "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-10-22 10:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 1/2] vhost: introduce vhost_has_work() Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2015-10-23 09:20 +0200

csiph-web