Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1253646

Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence

From Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence
Date 2015-10-22 11:30 +0200
Message-ID <qmkm6-6x6-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qm81B-5gx-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qm8kW-5Cw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qm9qG-7aO-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


* Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> > > v2:
> > > Use new ack sequence unconditionally. Remove pmu reset code.
> > 
> > So this is not something we can easily revert if things go bad. Esp.
> > since you build on it with the next patches.
> 
> Ok, and?

Sigh, you are being disruptive again.

> You want me to go back to the previous patch? That one is easily
> undoable (just disable the flag for the model)
> 
> Another alternative would be to fork the PMI handler into a new and
> an old version, that is switchable.

Here you pretend that you didn't read the sane solution that was suggested to you 
just three days ago:

  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151019070812.GB17855@gmail.com

  " > > Ingo, do you want to first merge the safe patch and then clean up?
    >
    > Yeah, would be nice to structure it that way, out of general paranoia.
  "

I.e. first apply the safe approach, then, after the dependent changes, clean it up 
by introducing the dangerous change.

The thing is, I'm close to summarily NAK-ing any patches from you to the perf 
subsystem, due to the unacceptably low quality patches combined with obtuse 
passive-aggressive obstruction you are routinely burdening maintainers with.

Btw., I noticed that you routinely don't Cc me to perf patches. Please always Cc: 
me to perf patches (both kernel and tooling patches). I still will not apply them 
directly, only if another perf maintainer signs off on them, but I'd like to have 
a record of all your submissions.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-21 22:20 +0200
  [PATCH 2/3] x86, perf: Factor out BTS enable/disable functions Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-21 22:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-21 22:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-21 23:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-22 11:30 +0200

csiph-web