Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1253646
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence |
| Date | 2015-10-22 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qmkm6-6x6-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qm81B-5gx-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qm8kW-5Cw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qm9qG-7aO-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > v2:
> > > Use new ack sequence unconditionally. Remove pmu reset code.
> >
> > So this is not something we can easily revert if things go bad. Esp.
> > since you build on it with the next patches.
>
> Ok, and?
Sigh, you are being disruptive again.
> You want me to go back to the previous patch? That one is easily
> undoable (just disable the flag for the model)
>
> Another alternative would be to fork the PMI handler into a new and
> an old version, that is switchable.
Here you pretend that you didn't read the sane solution that was suggested to you
just three days ago:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151019070812.GB17855@gmail.com
" > > Ingo, do you want to first merge the safe patch and then clean up?
>
> Yeah, would be nice to structure it that way, out of general paranoia.
"
I.e. first apply the safe approach, then, after the dependent changes, clean it up
by introducing the dangerous change.
The thing is, I'm close to summarily NAK-ing any patches from you to the perf
subsystem, due to the unacceptably low quality patches combined with obtuse
passive-aggressive obstruction you are routinely burdening maintainers with.
Btw., I noticed that you routinely don't Cc me to perf patches. Please always Cc:
me to perf patches (both kernel and tooling patches). I still will not apply them
directly, only if another perf maintainer signs off on them, but I'd like to have
a record of all your submissions.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-21 22:20 +0200
[PATCH 2/3] x86, perf: Factor out BTS enable/disable functions Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-21 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-21 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-21 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-22 11:30 +0200
csiph-web