Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1253679

Re: [PATCHv2 4.3-rc6] proc: fix convert from oom_score_adj to oom_adj

From Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCHv2 4.3-rc6] proc: fix convert from oom_score_adj to oom_adj
Date 2015-10-22 11:50 +0200
Message-ID <qmkFt-6UJ-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qmi0W-2WT-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu 22-10-15 06:49:01, Hongjie Fang (方洪杰) wrote:
> 
> The oom_adj has been replaced by oom_score_adj in kernel,
> but the /proc/pid/oom_adj is provided for legacy purposes.
> When write/read a value into/from /proc/pid/oom_adj,
> there is a transformation between oom_adj and oom_score_adj.
> 
> After writing a new value into /proc/pid/oom_adj, then read it.
> The return value is a different value than you wrote.
> Fix this by adding a adjustment factor.

... when printing the value.

Your previous patch has changed the stored value while this one only
changes the presented value. The previous one was more correct IMO
but in reality the difference (+-1) in oom_score_adj should be hardly
noticeable and nobody has complained about the current scaling for years
so this approach is probably more conservative.

> Signed-off-by: Hongjie Fang <hongjie.fang@spreadtrum.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

> ---
> Encountered the problem when I changed a task's oom_adj on
> an Android smart phone. As follows,
> 1. # cat /proc/1450/oom_adj
>    15
> 2. # echo 10 > /proc/1450/oom_adj
> 3. # cat /proc/1450/oom_adj
>    9
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index b25eee4..2312e43 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1019,15 +1019,19 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
>  	int oom_adj = OOM_ADJUST_MIN;
>  	size_t len;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	int adjust;
>  
>  	if (!task)
>  		return -ESRCH;
>  	if (lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) {
> -		if (task->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX)
> +		if (task->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX) {
>  			oom_adj = OOM_ADJUST_MAX;
> -		else
> -			oom_adj = (task->signal->oom_score_adj * -OOM_DISABLE) /
> +		} else {
> +			adjust = task->signal->oom_score_adj > 0 ?
> +				 (OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX-1) : -(OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX-1);
> +			oom_adj = (task->signal->oom_score_adj * -OOM_DISABLE + adjust) /
>  				  OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX;
> +		}
>  		unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
>  	}
>  	put_task_struct(task);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCHv2 4.3-rc6] proc: fix convert from oom_score_adj to oom_adj Hongjie Fang (方洪杰)   <Hongjie.Fang@spreadtrum.com> - 2015-10-22 09:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCHv2 4.3-rc6] proc: fix convert from oom_score_adj to oom_adj Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-22 11:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCHv2 4.3-rc6] proc: fix convert from oom_score_adj to  oom_adj David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2015-10-26 22:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCHv2 4.3-rc6] proc: fix convert from oom_score_adj to oom_adj Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-27 13:40 +0100

csiph-web