Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1255078

Re: [PATCH] pci: Update VPD size with correct length

From Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] pci: Update VPD size with correct length
Date 2015-10-24 03:00 +0200
Message-ID <qmVlE-1eL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qmGFZ-5oJ-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/23/2015 02:09 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> PCI-2.2 VPD entries have a maximum size of 32k, but might actually
> be smaller than that. To figure out the actual size one has to read
> the VPD area until the 'end marker' is reached.
> Trying to read VPD data beyond that marker results in 'interesting'
> effects, from simple read errors to crashing the card.
> This path modifies the attribute size to the avialable VPD size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/access.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
> index 6bc9b12..4f8208e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/access.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
> @@ -409,6 +409,34 @@ static int pci_vpd_f0_dev_check(struct pci_dev *dev)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>
> +/**
> + * pci_vpd_size - determine actual size of Vital Product Data
> + * @dev:	pci device struct
> + * @old_size:	current assumed size, also maximum allowed size
> + *
> + */
> +size_t
> +pci_vpd_pci22_size(struct pci_dev *dev, size_t old_size)
> +{
> +	loff_t off = 0;
> +	unsigned char header[1+2];	/* 1 byte tag, 2 bytes length */
> +
> +	while (off < old_size && pci_read_vpd(dev, off, 1, header)) {
> +		if (header[0] == 0x78)	/* End tag descriptor */
> +			return off + 1;
> +		if (header[0] & 0x80) {
> +			/* Large Resource Data Type Tag */
> +			if (pci_read_vpd(dev, off+1, 2, &header[1]) != 2)
> +				return off + 1;
> +			off += 3 + ((header[2] << 8) | header[1]);
> +		} else {
> +			/* Short Resource Data Type Tag */
> +			off += 1 + (header[0] & 0x07);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return old_size;
> +}
> +

My understanding is that the end tag can have some data associated with 
it such as a checksum.  What you may want to look at doing is process 
long tag and short tag bits first.  Then you could do a mask and compare 
after and if ((header[0] & ~0x7) == 0x78) then you return off + 1.

Also I was wondering if you have looked at the cxgb4 network driver? 
They are using the vpd read/write calls to access their EEPROM and I 
assume they are doing so outside the actual VPD fields.

- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] pci: Update VPD size with correct length Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2015-10-23 11:20 +0200
  [RFC PATCH] pci: pci_vpd_pci22_size can be static kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-23 12:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] pci: Update VPD size with correct length kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-23 12:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] pci: Update VPD size with correct length Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 03:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] pci: Update VPD size with correct length Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2015-10-25 04:40 +0100

csiph-web