Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1254862
| From | Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks |
| Date | 2015-10-23 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qmPgf-112-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qmt61-2wa-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qmG3g-4qs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qmHVn-7dR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qmIy5-8dX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qmJDR-1jR-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, Tetsuo. On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:25:11PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM only guarantees that a "struct task_struct" is preallocated > in order to avoid failing to allocate it on demand due to a GFP_KERNEL > allocation? Is this correct? > > WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE only guarantees that work items don't participate in > concurrency management in order to avoid failing to wake up a "struct > task_struct" which will process the work items? Is this correct? CPU_INTENSIVE avoids the tail end of concurrency management. The previous HIGHPRI or the posted IMMEDIATE avoids the head end. > Is Michal's question "does it make sense to use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM without > WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE"? In other words, any "struct task_struct" which calls > rescuer_thread() must imply WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE in order to avoid failing to > wake up due to being participated in concurrency management? If this is an actual problem, a better approach would be something which detects the stall condition and kicks off the next work item but if we do that I think I'd still trigger a warning there. I don't know. Don't go busy waiting in kernel. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-21 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-21 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-21 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-21 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-21 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-21 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-21 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-21 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-22 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-22 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-22 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-22 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-22 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-22 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-22 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-22 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-23 10:40 +0200
Make vmstat deferrable again (was Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks) Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-23 13:50 +0200
Re: Make vmstat deferrable again (was Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks) Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 14:10 +0200
Re: Make vmstat deferrable again (was Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks) Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-23 16:20 +0200
Re: Make vmstat deferrable again (was Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks) Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 17:00 +0200
Re: Make vmstat deferrable again (was Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks) Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-23 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-22 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()checks Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-22 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-23 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-23 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-23 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-23 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-25 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-27 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-27 13:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-27 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()checks Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-27 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable()checks Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Use accurate values for zone_reclaimable() checks Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-22 17:40 +0200
csiph-web