Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1250537
| From | Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 |
| Date | 2015-10-19 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qlfya-19G-41@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qlbEe-3Jv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qleVs-aI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlf5a-lZ-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlfeO-xB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlfov-IV-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Monday 19 October 2015 03:22 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 09:46:35AM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> > On ARC we could use the atomic EXchange to implement a user space only binary >> > semaphore - these atomic ops will be small duration so it is OK to spin wait for a >> > little bit. That's how the old pthread library worked for ARC w/o any atomic support. > That has the obvious problem of lock-holder-preemption and the horrible > performance issues that result from that. > > I think the syscall at least has deterministic behaviour, whereas that > userspace spin loop has this abysmal worst case thing. I agree - we can add that syscall trivially and use it based on build time feature detection for atomics ! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-18 13:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-19 01:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-19 07:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-19 08:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-19 11:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-19 11:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-19 11:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-19 12:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-19 12:10 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-20 10:10 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-20 12:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-20 12:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-29 17:00 +0100
Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-10-30 07:30 +0100
csiph-web