Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1250393
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence on Skylake |
| Date | 2015-10-19 09:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qlcJX-5we-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qk0hP-555-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qk0hQ-555-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkbPY-5nh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkdoK-7Ml-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkeNQ-1vA-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:35:14AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > In principle the sequence should work on other CPUs too, but > > > > since I only tested on Skylake it is only enabled there. > > > > > > I would very much like a reduction of the ack states. You introduced the > > > late thing, which should also work for everyone, and now you introduce yet > > > another variant. > > > > Ingo suggested to do it this way. Originally I thought it wasn't needed, but I > > think now that late-ack made some of the races that eventually caused Skylake > > LBR to fall over worse. So in hindsight it was a good idea to not use it > > everywhere. > > > > > I would very much prefer a single ack scheme if at all possible. > > > > Could enable it everywhere, but then users would need to test it on most types > > of CPUs, as I can't. > > I think Mike still has a Core2 machine (and I might be able to dig out a > laptop), Ingo should have a NHM(-EP), I have SNB, IVB-EP, HSW. So if you could > test at least BDW and SKL we might have decent test coverage. > > Ingo, do you want to first merge the safe patch and then clean up? Yeah, would be nice to structure it that way, out of general paranoia. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
perf: Some improvements for Skylake perf Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-16 01:40 +0200
[PATCH 3/4] perf, x86: Use counter freezing with Arch Perfmon v4 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-16 01:40 +0200
[PATCH 2/4] x86, perf: Factor out BTS enable/disable functions Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-16 01:40 +0200
[PATCH 4/4] x86, perf: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles:pp on Skylake Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-16 01:40 +0200
[PATCH 1/4] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence on Skylake Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-10-16 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence on Skylake Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-16 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence on Skylake Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-16 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence on Skylake Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-16 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence on Skylake Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, perf: Use a new PMU ack sequence on Skylake Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-19 09:10 +0200
csiph-web