Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1252416
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal |
| Date | 2015-10-21 03:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qlQHp-4T6-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qlM13-6so-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlPV1-3Ig-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlPV1-3Ig-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlQxH-4GQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> wrote: > On 10/20/2015 8:56 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> >> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:36:04 -0400 >> Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> wrote: >> >>> Allow userspace to override the default SIGKILL delivered >>> when a task_isolation process in STRICT mode does a syscall >>> or otherwise synchronously enters the kernel. >>> >> Is this really a good idea? This means that there's no way to terminate >> a task in this mode, even if it goes astray. > > > It doesn't map SIGKILL to some other signal unconditionally. It just allows > the "hey, you broke the STRICT contract and entered the kernel" signal > to be something besides the default SIGKILL. > ...which has the odd side effect that sending a non-fatal signal from another process will cause the strict process to enter the kernel and receive an extra signal. I still dislike this thing. It seems like a debugging feature being implemented using signals instead of existing APIs. I *still* don't see why perf can't be used to accomplish your goal. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-10-21 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> - 2015-10-21 03:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-10-21 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-21 03:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@ezchip.com> - 2015-10-21 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-21 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-22 23:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH v8 06/14] task_isolation: provide strict mode configurable signal Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb@ezchip.com> - 2015-10-24 11:20 +0200
csiph-web