Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1251983
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal |
| Date | 2015-10-20 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qlKLD-4Jw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qlF9g-4YG-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlFLX-5WV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlFLX-5WV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlFVF-69D-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:08:28PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > As discussed on IRC, another simpler (code line wise) solution is to > > simply clear the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag in the irq-armada-370-xp, which > > brings us back to what set_irq_flags() was doing, without actually > > reverting Rob's patch. > > > > However, relying on IRQ_NOAUTOEN being cleared doesn't seem like the > > right long term solution, which is why I implemented what I believe is > > a (hopefully) better long term solution. > > However, this is rather worrying. NOAUTOEN is supposed to avoid enabling > the interrupt when the interrupt is claimed. > > If, as a result of Rob's patch, we now have a load of IRQs which are > marked with NOAUTOEN which weren't, that's quite a large regression - > possibly one which hasn't been properly found (not everyone tests -rc > kernels) and we may be better to revert Rob's patch to avoid lots of > breakge being reported when 4.3 is released. > > I think Rob's patches need another review in light of this, to determine > how much breakage there is here, and a decision how to proceed made on > that basis. I'll go over them tomorrow again and decide then what to do. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-10-20 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-10-20 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-10-20 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-10-20 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-20 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-22 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-20 21:30 +0200
[PATCH] irqchip: irq-armada-370-xp: fix regression by clearing IRQ_NOAUTOEN Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-10-21 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] irqchip: irq-armada-370-xp: fix regression by clearing IRQ_NOAUTOEN Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> - 2015-10-21 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2015-10-21 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix regression introduced by set_irq_flags() removal Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> - 2015-10-20 16:10 +0200
csiph-web