Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1250230

Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm: Do not indent the arguments of DECLARE_BITMAP

From Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm: Do not indent the arguments of DECLARE_BITMAP
Date 2015-10-18 22:40 +0200
Message-ID <ql2Ui-7SB-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qjXah-pN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjXah-pN-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:16:28PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> Besides being a coding style issue, it confuses make tags:
> 
> ctags: Warning: include/kvm/arm_vgic.h:307: null expansion of name pattern "\1"
> ctags: Warning: include/kvm/arm_vgic.h:308: null expansion of name pattern "\1"
> ctags: Warning: include/kvm/arm_vgic.h:309: null expansion of name pattern "\1"
> ctags: Warning: include/kvm/arm_vgic.h:317: null expansion of name pattern "\1"
> 
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
> ---

Is not being able to deal with a whitespace not a make tags problem?

As for coding style, do we really entertain these kinds of changes just
to adhere to a coding style?  It feels unnecessary taints the log etc.

However, I'm curious what the general concesus and previous practice for
this sort of thing is?

Thanks,
-Christoffer

>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index d901f1a47be6..58c5c0eb8d2d 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -304,9 +304,9 @@ struct vgic_cpu {
>  	u8		*vgic_irq_lr_map;
>  
>  	/* Pending/active/both interrupts on this VCPU */
> -	DECLARE_BITMAP(	pending_percpu, VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
> -	DECLARE_BITMAP(	active_percpu, VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
> -	DECLARE_BITMAP(	pend_act_percpu, VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(pending_percpu, VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(active_percpu, VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(pend_act_percpu, VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
>  
>  	/* Pending/active/both shared interrupts, dynamically sized */
>  	unsigned long	*pending_shared;
> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ struct vgic_cpu {
>  	unsigned long   *pend_act_shared;
>  
>  	/* Bitmap of used/free list registers */
> -	DECLARE_BITMAP(	lr_used, VGIC_V2_MAX_LRS);
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(lr_used, VGIC_V2_MAX_LRS);
>  
>  	/* Number of list registers on this CPU */
>  	int		nr_lr;
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm: Do not indent the arguments of DECLARE_BITMAP Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2015-10-15 22:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm: Do not indent the arguments of  DECLARE_BITMAP Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> - 2015-10-18 22:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm: Do not indent the arguments of  DECLARE_BITMAP Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2015-10-19 14:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm: Do not indent the arguments of  DECLARE_BITMAP Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> - 2015-10-19 14:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm: Do not indent the arguments of  DECLARE_BITMAP Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2015-10-19 14:10 +0200

csiph-web