Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1248359
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding |
| Date | 2015-10-16 08:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qk6ng-5PQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q7vjr-15e-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7vjs-15e-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8IxY-8vQ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qk14e-6og-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 15-10-15, 17:22, Stephen Boyd wrote: > I'm lost why we need this property at all. What happened to using > > opp-microvolt-0 = <1 2 3>; > opp-microvolt-1 = <1>; > opp-microvolt-2 = <3 4 5>; > etc. Perhaps you are confusing this with the bindings we came up for picking right voltage levels based on the cuts/version of the hardware we are running on. The problem that Lee Jones mentioned and that can be used in your case as well. > That seems to avoid any problem with 3 vs. 1 element properties > combined into one large array. That's not the problem I was trying to solve here. > Having supply-names seems too > brittle and would tie us to a particular OPP user's decision to > call supplies by some name. No. The name has to match the <name>-supply property present in the device's node, that's why we need this property :) > Also, I've seen devices that are split across two power domains. > These devices aren't CPUs, but they are other devices including > L2 caches. So we're going to need either multiple regulator > support or multiple "power domain at a particular performance > levels" support somehow. Right, that's a good example of why we need multi-regulator support :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2015-10-16 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-10-16 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2015-10-16 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/16] PM / OPP: Add 'supply-names' binding Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-10-17 06:20 +0200
csiph-web