Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1246874
| From | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? |
| Date | 2015-10-14 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qjvQL-2a2-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qj7Y5-819-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjasV-3kA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjuhY-8cu-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjvnI-1lp-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjvH4-1Iz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 14-10-15 23:38:00, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > Why hasn't balance_dirty_pages throttled writers and allowed them to
> > > make the whole LRU dirty? What is your dirty{_background}_{ratio,bytes}
> > > configuration on that system.
> >
> > All values are defaults of plain CentOS 7 installation.
>
> So this is 3.10 kernel, right?
The userland is CentOS 7 but the kernel is linux-next-20151009.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Can't we use timeout based OOM warning/killing? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-06 17:00 +0200
Re: Can't we use timeout based OOM warning/killing? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-12 08:50 +0200
Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-12 17:30 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-10-12 23:30 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-13 14:30 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-10-13 18:40 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-14 14:30 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-15 15:20 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-16 18:00 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-10-16 20:40 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-16 20:50 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-13 15:40 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-13 18:20 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 15:30 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-14 16:40 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 17:00 +0200
Re: Silent hang up caused by pages being not scanned? Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-10-14 17:10 +0200
csiph-web