Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1246511

Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk

From Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk
Date 2015-10-14 13:00 +0200
Message-ID <qjrWN-4AF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q8pbY-5O1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8plE-5Zj-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgg1P-30J-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgwJl-21W-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <qheU2-6Ba-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > Basically I agree not to expose dma's quirk to slave controllers...But, the
> > fact I mentioned on cover letter explain the reasons why I have to let slave
> > controllers know that they are working with a broken dma. It's a dilemma
> > that if we don't want that to be exposed(let slave controllers' driver get
> > the info via a API), we have t add broken quirk for all of them ,here and
> > there, which seems to be a disaster:(
> 
> The problem with this API is that it transports values with device specific
> meanings over a generic API. Which is generally speaking not a good idea
> because the consumer witch is supposed to be generic suddenly needs to know
> which provider it is talking to.
> 
> A better solution in this case typically is either introduce a generic API
> with generic values or a custom API with custom values, but don't mix the two.
> 
> > 
> > I would appreciate it if you could give me some suggestions at your earliest
> > convenience. :)
> 
> In this case I think the best way to handle this is not quirks, but rather
> expose the actual maximum burst size using the DMA capabilities API. Since
> supporting only a certain burst depth is not really a quirk. All hardware
> has a limit for this and for some it might be larger or smaller than for
> others and it might be the same IP core but the maximum size depends on some
> IP core parameters. So this should be discoverable.

yes that makes more sense than adding quirks, exposing the right values
which should be a readable property for driver will ensure it works on
system with/without quirks

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's  quirk Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2015-10-06 11:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's  quirk Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2015-10-07 16:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's  quirk Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2015-10-09 13:30 +0200
  Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting  dma controller's quirk Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-10-08 10:40 +0200
    Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting  dma controller's quirk Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-10-09 13:40 +0200
    Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma  controller's quirk Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2015-10-09 13:40 +0200
    Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma  controller's quirk Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2015-10-14 13:00 +0200
      Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma  controller's quirk Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2015-10-14 16:40 +0200

csiph-web