Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1246511
| From | Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk |
| Date | 2015-10-14 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qjrWN-4AF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q8pbY-5O1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8plE-5Zj-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgg1P-30J-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgwJl-21W-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <qheU2-6Ba-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > Basically I agree not to expose dma's quirk to slave controllers...But, the > > fact I mentioned on cover letter explain the reasons why I have to let slave > > controllers know that they are working with a broken dma. It's a dilemma > > that if we don't want that to be exposed(let slave controllers' driver get > > the info via a API), we have t add broken quirk for all of them ,here and > > there, which seems to be a disaster:( > > The problem with this API is that it transports values with device specific > meanings over a generic API. Which is generally speaking not a good idea > because the consumer witch is supposed to be generic suddenly needs to know > which provider it is talking to. > > A better solution in this case typically is either introduce a generic API > with generic values or a custom API with custom values, but don't mix the two. > > > > > I would appreciate it if you could give me some suggestions at your earliest > > convenience. :) > > In this case I think the best way to handle this is not quirks, but rather > expose the actual maximum burst size using the DMA capabilities API. Since > supporting only a certain burst depth is not really a quirk. All hardware > has a limit for this and for some it might be larger or smaller than for > others and it might be the same IP core but the maximum size depends on some > IP core parameters. So this should be discoverable. yes that makes more sense than adding quirks, exposing the right values which should be a readable property for driver will ensure it works on system with/without quirks -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2015-10-06 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2015-10-07 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2015-10-09 13:30 +0200
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-10-08 10:40 +0200
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-10-09 13:40 +0200
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2015-10-09 13:40 +0200
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2015-10-14 13:00 +0200
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 06/10] dmaengine: add API for getting dma controller's quirk Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> - 2015-10-14 16:40 +0200
csiph-web