Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1248240

Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/15/2015 05:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 04:07 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2015 12:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>>>> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390
>>>>>> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers).
>>>>>> Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep
>>>>>> for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is
>>>>>> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in
>>>>>> the test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> v3:
>>>>>>  - correctly set syscall number on native arm64.
>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>>  - switch to nanosleep from a bad mix of poll and ppoll for testing restart.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this good to go? Failed to apply to linux-kselftest next.
>>>>> If you can rebase and resend. I can get this into 4.4-rc1
>>>>
>>>> Yes please. :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> ok. Please rebase to linux-kselftest next and resend the patch.
>>
>> Am I looking at the right tree? linux-kselftest#next doesn't appear to
>> have the s390 patch that was included in 4.3.
>>
> 
> I see what happened. Your patch is linux-next fixes and that went into
> 4.3-rc2. I can get linux-next rebase to 4.3-rc2 and get your patch in.
> Thanks for clearing this up.

oops rebase linux-kselftest next i.e

-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-10-06 21:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64 Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-15 16:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-10-15 20:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64 Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-15 22:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-10-16 00:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64 Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-16 01:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64 Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-10-16 01:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64 Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-16 04:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64 Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-16 01:10 +0200

csiph-web