Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1247858

Re: [RFT PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5250-snow-common

From Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFT PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5250-snow-common
Date 2015-10-15 16:50 +0200
Message-ID <qjS0V-Yf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qjOqm-48a-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjOqm-48a-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjPZ9-6v5-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hello Tomeu,

On 10/15/2015 02:30 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 15 October 2015 at 12:55, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javier@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
>> The Exynos5250 Snow Chromebooks have a Marvell WiFi SDIO chip which
>> can't neither be removed nor be detected. But the node isn't marked
>> as non-removable and instead has the broken-cd DT property.
>>
>> This causes the device to be removed when the system enters into a
>> suspend state and the following warnings is shown after a resume:
>>
>> [  181.944636] mmc2: error -2 during resume (card was removed?)
> 
> Hi Javier,
> 
> isn't wifi on snow on mmc_3?
>

Sigh, you are correct. It seems I have a really bad day and missed.

I got confused though because the node for mmc_0 (eMMC) in Snow
also has a broken-cd property instead of non-removable. I'll add
another patch to the series changing that.

I also noticed that the mmc_0 (eMMC) node in Peach boards have both
non-removable and broken-cd which doesn't make sense and the MMC
DT binding is clear that the options are mutually exclusive.

Seems to be copy & paste error from the vendor tree since the
downstream DTS also have both properties in the nodes. So I'll also
add patches to remove the broken-cd from these nodes.

> With your patch, I don't see any change, but if I do it on mmc_3
> instead, the machine fails to resume. Will try to get more info.
>

Yes, I wouldn't expect any changes since the patch is marking the
eMMC as non-removable but I wonder why is causing a fail to resume.
Are you sure the system is resuming without $SUBJECT? You mentioned
in IRC that S2R was broken for Snow in linux-next.

> Regards,
> 
> Tomeu
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable for Exynos Chromebooks Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-15 13:00 +0200
  [RFT PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5250-snow-common Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-15 13:00 +0200
    Re: [RFT PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5250-snow-common Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> - 2015-10-15 14:40 +0200
      Re: [RFT PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in  exynos5250-snow-common Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-15 16:50 +0200
  [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5420-peach-pit Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-15 13:00 +0200
  [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5800-peach-pi Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2015-10-15 13:00 +0200

csiph-web