Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1247796
| From | Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory |
| Date | 2015-10-15 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qjQLx-7Gi-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <q61ns-1ZQ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6sH0-7Px-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6NV8-4H2-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7uGK-6f-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8DoB-UH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 03:55:50PM +0100, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
[...]
> > Well, I still have not figured out whether on arm64 the raw accessors
> > required by ACPICA make sense.
> >
> > So either arm64 relies on the generic MCFG based raw read and writes
> > or we define the global raw read and writes as empty (ie x86 overrides
> > them anyway).
> >
>
> My concerns/ideas related to raw accessors for ARM64, please correct me
> at any point.
>
> ACPI spec - chapter: 19.5.96 OperationRegion (Declare Operation Region)
> defines PCI_Config as one of region types. Every time ASL opcode
> operates on corresponding PCI config space region, ASL interpreter is
> dispatching address space to our raw accessors, please see
> acpi_ex_pci_config_space_handler, acpi_ev_pci_config_region_setup calls.
> What is more important, such operations may happen after (yes after) bus
> enumeration, but always raw accessors are called at the end with the
> {segment, bus, dev, fn} tuple.
>
> Giving above, here are some ideas:
> 1. We force somehow vendors to avoid operations on PCI config regions in
> ASL code. PCI config region definitions still fall into Hardware Reduced
> profile, so new ACPICA special subset for ARM64 is need. Then raw ACPI
> accessors can be empty (and overridden by x86).
I am coming back to this, I am not sure that PCI config based OperationRegions
fall into Hardware Reduced profile, I will finally start a thread on ASWG
to check that.
Other than that, are you posting an updated version of this series soon ?
Let me know if you need help refactoring/testing the patches.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> 2. We provide raw accessors which translate {segment, bus, dev, fn}
> tuple to Linux generic accessors (this can be considered only if PCI
> config accesses happened after bus enumeration for HR profile, thus
> tuple to bus structure map is possible).
> 4. We rely on the generic MCFG based raw read and writes.
>
> Let me know your opinion.
>
> Thanks,
> Tomasz
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2015-10-15 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> - 2015-10-15 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-10-15 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> - 2015-10-15 21:00 +0200
csiph-web