Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1247604

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree

From Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
Date 2015-10-15 11:20 +0200
Message-ID <qjMRA-21D-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qjGsN-10W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjMyd-1oN-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Thursday 15 October 2015 13:26:02 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c:29:47: fatal error: asm-generic/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h: No such file or directory
> >  #include <asm-generic/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> >                                                ^
> > 
> > Caused by commit
> > 
> >   6a1d82fbc8e8 ("mfd: intel-lpss: Use writeq() helper")
> > 
> > interacting with commit
> > 
> >   f626fe17485b ("move io-64-nonatomic*.h out of asm-generic")
> > 
> > from the asm-generic tree.
> > 
> > I have added the following merge fix patch and can carry it as necessary.
> > 
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:23:20 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] mfd: fix for "move io-64-nonatomic*.h out of asm-generic"
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> 
> The patch looks good, should we do something to prevent that from
> becoming a problem when Linus pulls our branches?
> 
> This commit is at the bottom of my asm-generic git tree, so Lee could merge
> that one commit into his tree and fix up the merge correctly.
> 
> However, I also now see that drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns/hns_dsaf_xgmac.c
> has the same problem, so maybe it's better to add a temporary file
> with the old name containing "#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>",
> which I will remove in the following merge window or as a follow-up.
> 
> Yet another way would be for me to wait until Linus has pulled both
> mfd and netdev been merged, and I'll let him know of the conflict
> in my pull request.

I'll remain flexible.  Whatever you think is the best solution we'll
go with and I'll facilitate.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-10-15 04:30 +0200
  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-15 11:00 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-10-15 11:20 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-15 11:50 +0200
    Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2015-10-15 14:10 +0200
      Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-15 14:30 +0200
        Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-10-16 03:30 +0200
          Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-16 12:20 +0200

csiph-web