Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1247206
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings |
| Date | 2015-10-14 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qjBWa-2yn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qjuUG-KS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjBjs-1yI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjBt9-20C-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wednesday 14 October 2015 14:04:00 David Daney wrote: > On 10/14/2015 01:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 October 2015 08:47:44 David Daney wrote: > >> On 10/14/2015 07:06 AM, Sakshi Bansal wrote: > >>> Fixed allignment issues and line over 80 characters > >> > >> Use spell checking on 'allignment' > >> > >> But that is not the main problem with the patch... > >> > >> > >> You are changing things other than white space and comment formatting, > >> can you tell us on which platforms the patch was tested to verify that > >> you didn't break anything? > > > > In general a good advice, but for trivial whitespace or comment > > changes, this is normally not necessary. Compile-testing a patch > > as you say is normally expected, if only to avoid embarrassing > > complaints if it does break later. > > > > For drivers that are not enabled in the x86 allmodconfig, it sure > > helps to say something like "Compile-tested using MIPS cross toolchain > > from https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/". Even better would > > be to send a fix to decouple the driver from asm/octeon/*.h > > to make it build on all architectures, but that is much more work > > than I'd expect for a trivial patch. > > There is no point in such a patch. We know, a priori, that there will > *never* be a non-MIPS system with this hardware. We generally like to have all drivers compilable using COMPILE_TEST across all architectures, as that enables automated build regression tests from services like coverity or the 0-day build tester. It also makes it much easier for normal developers to test changes when they can verify them using a single toolchain and allmodconfig. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings Sakshi Bansal <sakshi.april5@gmail.com> - 2015-10-14 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-10-14 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-14 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-10-14 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-14 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-10-15 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2015-10-15 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2015-10-14 21:40 +0200
csiph-web