Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1245752
| From | Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be static |
| Date | 2015-10-13 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qj8r8-ok-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qeJUl-2dw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeJUl-2dw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qj6fD-5t6-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi,
On Tuesday 13 October 2015 05:08 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> HI
> How I am support to handle this patch? Should I just fix these warnings
> in my patch or I just add this as a separate patch on the top of the
> series?
This series has not been merged yet. So you can fix this patch.
Thanks
Kishon
>
>
> On 10/01/2015 04:34 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>> ---
>> phy-exynos-ufs.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
>> index 343fcaf..835ee78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static bool match_cfg_to_pwr_mode(u8 desc, u8
>> required_pwr)
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> -int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag,
>> u8 pwr)
>> +static int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag
>> tag, u8 pwr)
>> {
>> struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
>> struct exynos_ufs_phy_cfg **cfgs = ufs_phy->cfg;
>> @@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ out:
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt)
>> +static void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt)
>> {
>> struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
>>
>> ufs_phy->lane_cnt = lane_cnt;
>> }
>>
>> -int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy)
>> +static int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy)
>> {
>> struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
>> const unsigned int timeout_us = 100000;
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be static Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> - 2015-10-13 13:50 +0200 Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be static Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2015-10-13 16:10 +0200 Re: [kbuild-all] [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be static Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-13 16:40 +0200
csiph-web