Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1245785
| From | Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core |
| Date | 2015-10-13 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qj8Ua-Wq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qj4Qx-3vO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qj4QA-3vO-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <qj7Y5-819-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/13/2015 02:37 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Qais Yousef wrote:
>
>> + if (domain == NULL)
>> + domain = irq_default_domain; /* need a separate ipi_default_domain? */
> No tail comments please.
>
> We should neither use irq_default_domain nor have an
> ipi_default_domain.
OK though I understood that you were OK with using the irq_default_domain.
This means that arch code must parse the DT for an IPI domain. I think
I've seen arch code using the root FDT to search for a specific node.
I'll try to do something similar to search for an IPI domain.
>> +
>> + virq = irq_domain_alloc_descs(-1, nr_irqs, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>> + if (virq <= 0) {
>> + pr_warn("Can't reserve IPI, failed to alloc descs\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* we are reusing hierarchy alloc function, should we create another one? */
>> + virq = __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(domain, virq, nr_irqs, NUMA_NO_NODE,
>> + (void *) dest, true);
>> + if (virq <= 0) {
>> + pr_warn("Can't reserve IPI, failed to alloc irqs\n");
>> + goto free_descs;
>> + }
>> +
>> + data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
>> + bitmap_copy(data->ipi_mask.cpumask, dest->cpumask, dest->nbits);
>> + data->ipi_mask.nbits = dest->nbits;
> This does only initialize the first virq data. What about the others?
Right I missed that. I'll fix it.
>
>> + return virq;
>> +
>> +free_descs:
>> + irq_free_descs(virq, nr_irqs);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * irq_destroy_ipi() - unreserve an IPI that was previously allocated
>> + * @irq: linux irq number to be destroyed
>> + *
>> + * Return an IPI allocated with irq_reserve_ipi() to the system.
> That wants to explain that it actually destroys a number of virqs not
> just the primary one.
>
>
OK I'll expand on that.
Thanks,
Qais
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> - 2015-10-13 12:20 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-13 13:00 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-13 13:00 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-13 15:40 +0200
Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> - 2015-10-13 16:40 +0200
csiph-web