Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1245785

Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core

From Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core
Date 2015-10-13 16:40 +0200
Message-ID <qj8Ua-Wq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qj4Qx-3vO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qj4QA-3vO-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <qj7Y5-819-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/13/2015 02:37 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Qais Yousef wrote:
>
>> +	if (domain == NULL)
>> +		domain = irq_default_domain; /* need a separate ipi_default_domain? */
> No tail comments please.
>
> We should neither use irq_default_domain nor have an
> ipi_default_domain.

OK though I understood that you were OK with using the irq_default_domain.

This means that arch code must parse the DT for an IPI domain. I think 
I've seen arch code using the root FDT to search for a specific node. 
I'll try to do something similar to search for an IPI domain.

>> +
>> +	virq = irq_domain_alloc_descs(-1, nr_irqs, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>> +	if (virq <= 0) {
>> +		pr_warn("Can't reserve IPI, failed to alloc descs\n");
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* we are reusing hierarchy alloc function, should we create another one? */
>> +	virq = __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(domain, virq, nr_irqs, NUMA_NO_NODE,
>> +					(void *) dest, true);
>> +	if (virq <= 0) {
>> +		pr_warn("Can't reserve IPI, failed to alloc irqs\n");
>> +		goto free_descs;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
>> +	bitmap_copy(data->ipi_mask.cpumask, dest->cpumask, dest->nbits);
>> +	data->ipi_mask.nbits = dest->nbits;
> This does only initialize the first virq data. What about the others?

Right I missed that. I'll fix it.


>
>> +	return virq;
>> +
>> +free_descs:
>> +	irq_free_descs(virq, nr_irqs);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * irq_destroy_ipi() - unreserve an IPI that was previously allocated
>> + * @irq: linux irq number to be destroyed
>> + *
>> + * Return an IPI allocated with irq_reserve_ipi() to the system.
> That wants to explain that it actually destroys a number of virqs not
> just the primary one.
>
>

OK I'll expand on that.

Thanks,
Qais
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> - 2015-10-13 12:20 +0200
  Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code  to irq core kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-13 13:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code  to irq core kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-13 13:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code  to irq core Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-13 15:40 +0200
    Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 07/14] irq: add a new generic IPI reservation code  to irq core Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> - 2015-10-13 16:40 +0200

csiph-web