Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1245082

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: unix: fix use-after-free

From Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: unix: fix use-after-free
Date 2015-10-12 22:00 +0200
Message-ID <qiRqi-A2-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qhxjX-7VM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qinix-7fN-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/11/2015 07:55 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
> Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2015 00:15:59 -0400
> 
>> These patches are against mainline, I can re-base to net-next, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> They have been tested against: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/13/195,
>> which causes the use-after-free quite quickly and here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/2/693.
> 

Hi,

> I'd like to understand how patches that don't even compile can be
> "tested"?
> 
> net/unix/af_unix.c: In function ‘unix_dgram_writable’:
> net/unix/af_unix.c:2480:3: error: ‘other_full’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> net/unix/af_unix.c:2480:3: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> Could you explain how that works, I'm having a hard time understanding
> this?
> 

Traveling this week, so responses a bit delayed.

Yes, I screwed up the posting. I had some outstanding code in my
local tree to make it compile, but I failed to refresh my patch series
with this outstanding code before mailing it out. So what I tested/built
was not quite what I mailed out.

As soon as I noticed this issue in patch 3/3 I re-posted it here:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=144440355808472&w=2

in an attempt to avoid this confusion. I'm happy to re-post the series
or whatever makes things easiest for you.

> Also please address Hannes's feedback, thanks.
> 

I've replied directly to Hannes.

Thanks,

-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v4 0/3] net: unix: fix use-after-free Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> - 2015-10-09 06:20 +0200
  [PATCH v4 3/3] net: unix: optimize wakeups in unix_dgram_recvmsg() Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> - 2015-10-09 06:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] net: unix: optimize wakeups in  unix_dgram_recvmsg() kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-09 06:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] net: unix: optimize wakeups in unix_dgram_recvmsg() Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> - 2015-10-09 17:20 +0200
  [PATCH v4 2/3] net: unix: Convert gc_flags to flags Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> - 2015-10-09 06:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: unix: fix use-after-free David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-10-11 13:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: unix: fix use-after-free Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2015-10-12 15:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: unix: fix use-after-free Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 15:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: unix: fix use-after-free Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> - 2015-10-12 22:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: unix: fix use-after-free David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-10-13 03:40 +0200

csiph-web