Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set"

From	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set"
Date	2015-10-12 20:00 +0200
Message-ID	<qiPya-6fF-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <qiOC6-4Us-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiOC7-4Us-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiPou-64e-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiPov-64e-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qiPya-6fF-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:52:08AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:45:08PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > 
> > > But yeah if you guys want to create a new parameter that gathers nohz
> > > and isolcpus I think we can.
> > 
> > Could we also add the rcu settings?
> 
> I thought that I already had.  What am I still missing?
> 
> > > task_isolation is really just about tasks so it should be another name.
> > 
> > no_os_cpus?
> > 
> > os_free_cpus?
> 
> os_jitter_free_cpus?
> 
> clean_cpus?
> 
> quiet_cpus?
> 
> I have no problem with any of the names proposed thus far, but obviously
> could not resist the urge to propose a few more.

I moved forward quite slowly with nohz full over the years but at least I'm proud
that this subsystem introduced some of the most interesting naming challenges!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 17:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-10-12 17:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 18:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-10-12 19:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> - 2015-10-12 19:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 19:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is  set" Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-12 19:50 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 20:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 20:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-10-12 20:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is  set" Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-10-12 20:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-10-12 20:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> - 2015-10-12 20:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is  set" Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-12 22:00 +0200

csiph-web