Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1244848

Re: [PATCH] signal: Make the si_code check in rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo stricter

From Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] signal: Make the si_code check in rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo stricter
Date 2015-10-12 18:00 +0200
Message-ID <qiNG2-3wf-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qiNmG-38X-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/12, Amanieu d'Antras wrote:
>
> rt_sigqueueinfo and rt_tgsigqueueinfo check the value of si_code to
> prevent a process from spoofing a kernel-generated signal or one
> generated by kill/tgkill.
>
> Unfortunately this check failed to take into account the fact that
> the si_code value seen by a user process is only the low 16 bits of
> the value in the kernel. It was still possible to spoof any si_code
> by ORing 0xffff into the top 16 bits.

Confused...

> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -2989,7 +2989,7 @@ static int do_rt_sigqueueinfo(pid_t pid, int sig, siginfo_t *info)
>  	/* Not even root can pretend to send signals from the kernel.
>  	 * Nor can they impersonate a kill()/tgkill(), which adds source info.
>  	 */
> -	if ((info->si_code >= 0 || info->si_code == SI_TKILL) &&
> +	if (((short)info->si_code >= 0 || (short)info->si_code == SI_TKILL) &&
>  	    (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid))
>  		return -EPERM;
>
> @@ -3037,7 +3037,7 @@ static int do_rt_tgsigqueueinfo(pid_t tgid, pid_t pid, int sig, siginfo_t *info)
>  	/* Not even root can pretend to send signals from the kernel.
>  	 * Nor can they impersonate a kill()/tgkill(), which adds source info.
>  	 */
> -	if ((info->si_code >= 0 || info->si_code == SI_TKILL) &&
> +	if (((short)info->si_code >= 0 || (short)info->si_code == SI_TKILL) &&
>  	    (task_pid_vnr(current) != pid))
>  		return -EPERM;

Yes, copy_siginfo_to_user() does __put_user((short)from->si_code).
But SI_FROMUSER/SI_FROMKERNEL are internal kernel checks, we mostly
use them in copy_siginfo_to_user().

And note that if ->si_code < 0 we simply do __copy_to_user(), so
userspace can't see something which looks like "from kernel", in
this case we do not truncate ->si_code.

So I do not think this patch is right.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] signal: Make the si_code check in rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo stricter Amanieu d'Antras <amanieu@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 17:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] signal: Make the si_code check in rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo  stricter Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-12 18:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] signal: Make the si_code check in rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo stricter "Amanieu d'Antras" <amanieu@gmail.com> - 2015-10-12 18:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] signal: Make the si_code check in rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo  stricter Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-10-13 17:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] signal: Make the si_code check in rt_[tg]sigqueueinfo stricter "Amanieu d'Antras" <amanieu@gmail.com> - 2015-10-13 17:50 +0200

csiph-web