Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1242269

Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0

From Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0
Date 2015-10-08 13:50 +0200
Message-ID <qhhRU-2oG-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qhhRU-2oG-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/08/2015 11:21 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> commit 7494b07ebaae2117629024369365f7be7adc16c3 ("ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro")
>
> [    0.000000] ACPI: undefined MADT subtable type for FADT 4.0: 127 (length 12)

Seems that the MADT table contains reserved subtable type (0x7F),
so this is traded as a wrong type in our patch.

> [    0.000000] ACPI: Error parsing LAPIC address override entry

This was called by early_acpi_parse_madt_lapic_addr_ovr() in
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c, which is scanning MADT for the first
time when booting, so it will fail the boot process when finding
the reserved MADT subtable type.

> [    0.000000] ACPI: Invalid BIOS MADT, disabling ACPI

As the spec said in Table 5-46 (ACPI 6.0):

0x10-0x7F Reserved. OSPM skips structures of the reserved type.

Should we just ignore those reserved type when scanning the MADT
table? In the patch "ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to
eventually replace the macro", we just trade it as wrong, that's
why we failed to boot the system.

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog  detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2015-10-08 13:50 +0200
  Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog  detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> - 2015-10-08 18:40 +0200
    Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-08 22:10 +0200
      Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-08 22:20 +0200
        Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog  detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> - 2015-10-08 22:40 +0200
          Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-09 00:30 +0200
            Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog  detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> - 2015-10-09 01:10 +0200
              Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-09 22:40 +0200
                Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog  detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org> - 2015-10-10 01:00 +0200
                Re: [lkp] [ACPI] 7494b07eba: Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog  detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> - 2015-10-10 01:50 +0200

csiph-web