Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1241961
| From | Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests. |
| Date | 2015-10-08 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qhbCN-210-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qh3vA-78b-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/07/2015 10:21 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Hey, > > I was running some tools in which we would heavily do rescheduling > of events - and realized to my surprise that the event channels (and > the hypercall) would slow things down. If I used the vAPIC with its > IPI support (so no VMEXIT) I got much much better performance. > > Now this is an RFC because: > 1). I hadn't verified from the xentrace how much less VMEXITS we get. > But I remember Boris's patches and they gave at least 10%. > I think this will get the same performance or even better. > > 2). I don't know what to do with migration. That is if the guest > migrates to older hardware it needs to recheck this I presume? Same problem applies to many other features. In case you want to migrate to a machine with less features you'd have to mask those features in the cpuid data of the domain. > 3). Should this be enabled by default? I did get better performance > but that was synthetic. Having some benchmark results would help to decide this. :-) I'd be especially interested in checking "no vcpu over-commitment" and "heavy vcpu over-commitment" scenarios regarding the effect of the feature. > > Thoughts? I like the idea. Juergen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests. Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2015-10-07 22:30 +0200
[RFC PATCH v1 2/2] xen_nopv: Combine a bunch of the PV features that can be disabled Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2015-10-07 22:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] xen_nopv: Combine a bunch of the PV features that can be disabled Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-10-07 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests. Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2015-10-08 07:10 +0200
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests. Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> - 2015-10-08 11:40 +0200
csiph-web