Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1241961

Re: [RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests.

From Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests.
Date 2015-10-08 07:10 +0200
Message-ID <qhbCN-210-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qh3vA-78b-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/07/2015 10:21 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I was running some tools in which we would heavily do rescheduling
> of events - and realized to my surprise that the event channels (and
> the hypercall) would slow things down. If I used the vAPIC with its
> IPI support (so no VMEXIT) I got much much better performance.
>
> Now this is an RFC because:
>   1). I hadn't verified from the xentrace  how much less VMEXITS we get.
>      But I remember Boris's patches and they gave at least 10%.
>      I think this will get the same performance or even better.
>
>   2). I don't know what to do with migration. That is if the guest
>      migrates to older hardware it needs to recheck this I presume?

Same problem applies to many other features. In case you want to
migrate to a machine with less features you'd have to mask those
features in the cpuid data of the domain.

>   3). Should this be enabled by default? I did get better performance
>     but that was synthetic.

Having some benchmark results would help to decide this. :-)

I'd be especially interested in checking "no vcpu over-commitment"
and "heavy vcpu over-commitment" scenarios regarding the effect of
the feature.

>
> Thoughts?

I like the idea.


Juergen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests. Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2015-10-07 22:30 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] xen_nopv: Combine a bunch of the PV features that can be disabled Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> - 2015-10-07 22:30 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] xen_nopv: Combine a bunch of the PV features  that can be disabled Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2015-10-07 23:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests. Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2015-10-08 07:10 +0200
    Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Use vAPIC when doing IPI for PVHVM guests. Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> - 2015-10-08 11:40 +0200

csiph-web