RE: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	RE: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option
Date	Fri, 09 Oct 2015 23:50:01 +0200
Message-ID	<qhNI5-655-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qhySK-1As-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qhzOO-2W9-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>, Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
X-Extloop1	1
X-Ironport-Av	E=Sophos;i="5.17,659,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="788841533"
Thread-Topic	[PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option
Thread-Index	AQHRAlbquI+H3Y6uOEWOrU7Rq/7mcp5jLTkAgACEx9A=
Accept-Language	en-US
Content-Language	en-US
X-Originating-IP	[10.22.254.140]
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8BIT
MIME-Version	1.0
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID	<linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	14
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, "mel@csn.ul.ie" <mel@csn.ul.ie>, "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
X-Original-Date	Fri, 9 Oct 2015 21:43:50 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32B534D5@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
X-Original-References	<1444402599-15274-1-git-send-email-izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> <561762DC.3080608@huawei.com>
X-Original-Sender	linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref	csiph.com linux.kernel:1243680

Show key headers only | View raw

> I remember Kame has already suggested this idea. In my opinion,
> I still think it's better to add a new migratetype or a new zone,
> so both user and kernel could use mirrored memory.

A new zone would be more flexible ... and probably the right long
term solution.  But this looks like a very clever was to try out the
feature with a minimally invasive patch.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-10-09 08:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-10-09 09:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-10-09 11:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-10-09 12:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2015-10-09 17:10 +0200
          RE: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-10-09 21:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2015-10-12 12:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-10-10 04:20 +0200
          RE: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-10-12 20:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-10-13 12:00 +0200
    RE: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-10-09 23:50 +0200
      RE: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option "Izumi, Taku" <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-10-14 03:20 +0200

csiph-web