Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1241707
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: hdmac: factorise memset descriptor allocation |
| Date | 2015-10-07 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qh0R4-3eS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qeNuW-7IQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeNuW-7IQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgXqb-6Da-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Vinod,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:54:13PM +0100, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 04:52:37PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > +static struct at_desc *atc_create_memset_desc(struct dma_chan *chan,
> > + dma_addr_t psrc,
> > + dma_addr_t pdst,
> > + size_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct at_dma_chan *atchan = to_at_dma_chan(chan);
> > + struct at_desc *desc;
> > + size_t xfer_count;
> > +
> > + u32 ctrla = ATC_SRC_WIDTH(2) |
> > + ATC_DST_WIDTH(2);
>
> why is this over two lines :)
>
> > + u32 ctrlb = ATC_DEFAULT_CTRLB | ATC_IEN |
> > + ATC_SRC_ADDR_MODE_FIXED |
> > + ATC_DST_ADDR_MODE_INCR |
> > + ATC_FC_MEM2MEM;
> > +
> > + xfer_count = len >> 2;
> > + if (xfer_count > ATC_BTSIZE_MAX) {
> > + dev_err(chan2dev(chan), "%s: buffer is too big\n",
> > + __func__);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
>
> This is fine, but this is driver limitation. We should really split the
> txn to multiple descriptors here..
Both these things are actually just copy from the previous code.
I can probably fix the first style issue in this patch, but splitting
the memset descriptors should go in a separate patch.
>
> > @@ -914,46 +953,26 @@ atc_prep_dma_memset(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dest, int value,
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > - xfer_count = len >> 2;
> > - if (xfer_count > ATC_BTSIZE_MAX) {
> > - dev_err(chan2dev(chan), "%s: buffer is too big\n",
> > + vaddr = dma_pool_alloc(atdma->memset_pool, GFP_ATOMIC, &paddr);
>
> Mostly people use _zalloc variant, any reason why you don't want that
Not necessarily, but I don't need zeroed memory either, since I
overwrite the content right after the allocation.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: hdmac: factorise memset descriptor allocation Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2015-10-07 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: hdmac: factorise memset descriptor allocation Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2015-10-07 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: hdmac: factorise memset descriptor allocation Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2015-10-09 17:30 +0200
csiph-web