Re: [PATCH 0/3] sys_membarrier (x86, generic)

From	Rusty Russell <rusty@ozlabs.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/3] sys_membarrier (x86, generic)
Date	2015-10-06 04:10 +0200
Message-ID	<qgpRw-vR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pKNyO-2hl-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> writes:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Here is a repost of sys_membarrier, rebased on top of Linus commit
> c4b5fd3fb2058b650447372472ad24e2a989f9f6 without any change since the
> last v19 post other that proceeding to further testing. When merging
> with other system calls, system call number conflicts should be quite
> straightforward to handle, there is nothing special there.

Hi Mathieu,

        Great to see this go in!  One small note: it talks about
threads, but membarrier as currently implemented would cover any shared
memory.  If you plan to optimize in future, that might not be the case:
we'd want an address argument for those cases?

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/3] sys_membarrier (x86, generic) Rusty Russell <rusty@ozlabs.org> - 2015-10-06 04:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] sys_membarrier (x86, generic) Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2015-10-06 04:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] sys_membarrier (x86, generic) Rusty Russell <rusty@ozlabs.org> - 2015-10-09 02:50 +0200

csiph-web