Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1239636

Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing

From Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing
Date 2015-10-05 17:10 +0200
Message-ID <qgfyO-2sl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qfhCG-P8-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qg9D4-2es-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Peter

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 10:45:29AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2015-10-03 01:05, Peter Rosin wrote:

[...]

> Ok, I found the culprit, and I double and triple checked it this time...
> 
> If I move to the very latest on the linux-3.18-at91 branch, the bug is
> there too. Which made it vastly more palatable to bisect the bug.
> 
> The offender (in the 4.2 kernel) is 93563a6a71bb69dd324fc7354c60fb05f84aae6b
> "i2c: at91: fix a race condition when using the DMA controller"
> which is far more understandable. Ao, adding Cyrille Pitchen to the Cc list.
> 

Thanks for the bisecting effort. I am currently at ELCE where I have
met someone with the same kind of issue. Is it easily reproducible? It
doesn't seem to be the case for him.

I'll have a look once back.

> If I add that patch on top of my previously working tree, it behaves just
> as newer kernels, i.e. equally bad. The patch doesn't revert cleanly, but
> reverting the patch and quick-n-dirty-fixing the conflict on vanilla 4.2
> makes the problem go away.
> 
> I have attached what I actually reverted.
> 
> Cheers,
> Peter
> 

Ludovic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Regression: at24 eeprom writing Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> - 2015-10-03 01:10 +0200
  Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> - 2015-10-04 22:00 +0200
    Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 08:50 +0200
      Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> - 2015-10-06 18:50 +0200
  Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> - 2015-10-05 10:50 +0200
    Re: Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-05 11:10 +0200
    Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-10-05 17:10 +0200
      Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> - 2015-10-05 17:10 +0200
        Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> - 2015-10-12 17:20 +0200
          Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com> - 2015-10-12 18:20 +0200
            Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> - 2015-10-13 12:40 +0200
              Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2015-10-13 15:00 +0200
                Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> - 2015-10-13 16:40 +0200
              Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing "ludovic.desroches@atmel.com" <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-10-13 15:30 +0200
    Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com> - 2015-10-05 17:30 +0200
      Re: Regression: at24 eeprom writing Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> - 2015-10-05 18:00 +0200

csiph-web