Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1241270
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 |
| Date | 2015-10-07 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qgT3e-st-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qfaKS-7Fv-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgrgC-2u2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgF9T-5H4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgQ5k-4HJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgSgO-7JK-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 2015-10-07 at 02:19 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:00:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > It's also worth noting that the __flush_power7 uses tlbiel instead of tlbie. > > > > Yeah that's a good point. It's not clear if the swsusp code wants to a local or > > a global invalidate. > > If I read the code right, this is called on the boot CPU when all the > non-boot CPUs are still (potentially) down, so if you would do a global > invalidate the non-boot CPUs might not even notice, so those need to do > a (local) invalidate after being brought up anyway? Or they probably > need it before being brought down at all? You figure it out, it makes > my brain hurt :-) A good rule would be that every cpu does a local invalidate before turning on the MMU. That would work for this case and also for kexec, kdump, junk left by firmare etc. But I don't think we do that consistently in a way that works for this code at the moment. > > As an alternative, can you try adding a .machine push / .machine "power4" / > > .machine pop, around the tlbie. That should tell the assembler to drop back to > > power4 mode for that instruction, which should then do the right thing. There > > are some examples in that file. > > That will get the assembler to not complain, but it will assemble the wrong > instruction: the power7 instruction has the same opcode (but different > semantics). So if you assemble a "tlbie r4" in power4 mode, a newer CPU > will see it as a "tlbie r4,r0" and do the wrong thing. Yeah, it would basically maintain the existing behaviour which is wrong but a known quantity. I suspect no one has ever run this on Power7 or in fact anything other than G5 or Book3E. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2015-10-06 05:40 +0200
Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2015-10-06 20:30 +0200
Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2015-10-07 08:10 +0200
Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> - 2015-10-07 10:30 +0200
Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2015-10-07 11:20 +0200
Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> - 2015-10-07 16:40 +0200
Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> - 2015-10-08 02:20 +0200
Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2015-10-08 02:40 +0200
Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2015-10-08 02:20 +0200
csiph-web