Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1240721

Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller

From Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller
Date 2015-10-06 18:50 +0200
Message-ID <qgDB9-3mf-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qgD86-2O1-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgD86-2O1-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qgDB9-3mf-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization ARM Ltd

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/10/15 17:27, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller

[...]

Please use an email client that does proper quoting - I cannot see what
you are replying to. Or at least annotate your answers so that I can
spot them.

>> +struct nwl_msi {			/* struct nwl_msi - MSI information */
>> +	struct msi_controller chip;	/* chip: MSI controller */
> 
>> We're moving away from msi_controller altogether, as the kernel now
>> has all the necessary infrastructure to do this properly.
> 
> Our current GIC version does not have separate msi controller (we are
> not using GICv2m or GICv3), so is it necessary to have separate msi
> controller node ? Please give me clarity on this.

This has nothing to do with the version of the GIC you are using (XGene
doesn't have GICv2m or v3 either). This is about reducing code
duplication and having something that we can maintain. See also
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/20/193 for yet another example.

I still plan to kill msi_controller, and I'd like to avoid more
dependencies with it. MSI domains are the way to do it.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL  PCIe Host Controller Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-10-06 18:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL  PCIe Host Controller Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-10-06 18:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL  PCIe Host Controller Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-10-09 10:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-09 10:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL  PCIe Host Controller Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-10-09 11:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL  PCIe Host Controller Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-10-09 16:20 +0200

csiph-web