Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1238757
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] kselftest: timers: Add adjtick test to validate adjtimex() tick adjustments |
| Date | 2015-10-03 09:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qfpJU-3Pm-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qfht1-oF-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: > Recently an issue was reported that was difficult to detect except > by tweaking the adjtimex tick value, and noticing how quickly the > adjustment took to be made: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/1/488 > > Thus this patch introduces a new test which manipulates the adjtimex > tick value and validates the results are what we expect. So I tried to run this: triton:~/tip/tools/testing/selftests/timers> ./adjtick systick: 10000 Estimating tick (act: 9000 usec, -100000 ppm): 10000 usec, 1 ppmWARNING: Unexpected adjtimex return values, make sure ntpd is not running. triton:~/tip/tools/testing/selftests/timers> note the weird placement of the warning, and there's also no newline at the end. It would also be nice to print out roughly how long the test will take - since it runs longer than 1-2 seconds. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3] kselftest: timers: Add adjtick test to validate adjtimex() tick adjustments John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-10-03 01:00 +0200 Re: [PATCH v3] kselftest: timers: Add adjtick test to validate adjtimex() tick adjustments Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-03 09:50 +0200
csiph-web