Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1238747

Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:00:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 23:46:59 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > FYI, I've upgraded from 4.1.7 to 4.2.1 (and retested with 4.2.2) and
> > everything is scheduled on 1 CPU out of 4 (i5 760).
> > 
> > 	$ sudo cat /proc/1/status | grep cpu -i
> > 	Cpus_allowed:   1
> > 	Cpus_allowed_list:      0
> > 
> > Every process inherits this tiny cpumask.
> 
> Sell the other CPUs on ebay?
> 
> I haven't seen such a report before - maybe it rings a bell with Peter
> & Ingo?

I think this is related to some NO_HZ_FULL quackery. People seem to have
enabled stuff they've really no sane reason for.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-10-02 23:10 +0200
  Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-03 09:00 +0200
    Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-03 09:40 +0200
      Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 10:20 +0200
        Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-03 10:20 +0200
          Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 10:30 +0200
            Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-03 11:00 +0200
              Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:10 +0200
                Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:40 +0200
                Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:50 +0200
        Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:20 +0200
          Re: 4.2.2: NR_CPUS effectively being 1 bug Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 14:30 +0200

csiph-web